Which description best defines 'friends with benefits'?

Which description best defines 'friends with benefits'?

• A. A romantic relationship with commitment.
• B. A casual friendship with no sexual activity.
• C. Relationships with sexual activity but no romantic commitment.
• D. A transactional dating arrangement with marriage promises.

Answer: (C)

The main idea being tested is what “friends with benefits” means: two friends who have a sexual relationship without pursuing romantic commitment. This matches the description of relationships with sexual activity but no romantic commitment, where the emphasis is on sex within a friendship rather than forming a traditional dating relationship. It’s not simply a casual friendship with no sex, because there is sexual activity involved. It’s also not a romantic relationship with commitment, which would imply dating with ongoing exclusive vibes. And it isn’t a transactional arrangement with marriage promises, which adds a different, more goal-oriented dynamic.

The main idea being tested is what “friends with benefits” means: two friends who have a sexual relationship without pursuing romantic commitment. This matches the description of relationships with sexual activity but no romantic commitment, where the emphasis is on sex within a friendship rather than forming a traditional dating relationship. It’s not simply a casual friendship with no sex, because there is sexual activity involved. It’s also not a romantic relationship with commitment, which would imply dating with ongoing exclusive vibes. And it isn’t a transactional arrangement with marriage promises, which adds a different, more goal-oriented dynamic.